Toyota Yaris: Latin NCAP rating explained
The Latin NCAP administered fresh smash tests on the Toyota Yaris after having preliminarily tested the model in 2019. The 2021 automobile was awarded a depressing one-star standing – the smallest standing awarded to an automobile from the manufacturer by the agency.
Not to live confused with the European-spec Yaris, the automobile for Latin America is basically the equal as the one on trade in India until many weeks ago, but accoutre out for Latin American requests and manufactured in Brazil as well as Thailand.
The Toyota Yaris, produced in Brazil and Thailand, with dual airbags and Electronic Stability Control (ESC) as standard achieved one star under Latin NCAPs rearmost protocol. The popular B member model achieved41.43 in the Adult Inhabitant box,63.85 in the Child Inhabitant box,61.63 in Pedestrian Protection and Vulnerable Road Druggies box and41.86 in the Safety Assist box.
The Yaris for the Spanish American market doesn’t provide facet body and side head protection airbags as commonplace just like the model sold in Malaysia for example. within the frontal impact check (unit tested in 2019) the model showed unstable structure and unstable footwell space performance. facet impact showed a door gap throughout the test. A door opening in Latin NCAP side impact test, that has an equivalent configuration as Regulation UN95, implies that the automobile would have been unsuccessful in the UN95 test.
The Yaris seatbelt reminder system (SBR) showed no detection of the front passenger. The door opening within the facet impact needs immediate action by Toyota because it poses a significant risk of ejection in the case of side impacts. The result’s valid for the hatchback and sedan versions of the Yaris. This model offers facultative instrumentality that may probably contribute to higher performance and will become commonplace altogether model vary at the time of this publication however a call of Toyota in Mexico affected negatively the standardization of key equipment to boost the results of the Yaris. Toyota refused to check the optional equipment to point out its performance that opens the question of the effectiveness of these further safety elements.
The Yaris has been tested in frontal impact, side-impact, whiplash, pedestrian protection, and ESC. The star result is explained by poor side impact protection, marginal whiplash protection in terms of dynamics, missing standard side head protection airbags, and missing passenger seat belt reminder (SBR) according to Latin NCAP pedestrian protection performance showed a reasonable level.
Suzuki Baleno: Latin NCAP crash test results
The produced-in-India Maruti Suzuki Baleno has just been put through the Latin New Car Assessment Programme (Latin NCAP) crash tests and surfaced with a down of zero stars. The model tested was made at Maruti Suzuki’s factory in Gujarat and exported to the Latin American requests. Before this time, another produced-in-India Suzuki automobile, the Swift, got a zero star standing.
The Suzuki Baleno made in India with two airbags as standard achieved zero stars. The popular compact automobile achieved20.03 in the Adult inhabitant box,17.06 in the Child Inhabitant box,64.06 in Pedestrian Protection and Vulnerable Road Druggies box and6.98 in the Safety Assist box.
The Baleno was tested in the frontal impact and side-impact, whiplash, and pedestrian protection. In the frontal impact, the model showed stable structure performance. Side impact test showed high intrusion in the door with poor protection to the chest of the adult door during the test. Whiplash test showed marginal neck protection.
The zero stars result is explained by the poor side impact protection, marginal whiplash protection, lack of standard side body and head protection airbags, lack of standard Electronic Stability Control (ESC), and the decision of Suzuki not to recommend Child Restraint Systems (CRS) for the test. Pedestrian protection performance showed a reasonable level.
The Baleno has been checked for frontal and facet impact, whiplash, and pedestrian protection; within the case of a frontal impact, the model showed stable structural performance; the side impact test showed a high level of penetration into the door throughout the test with very little protection for the door of the adult door. The whiplash test showed marginal neck protection.
The zero-star result’s explained by the poor side impact protection, the minor whiplash protection, the shortage of normal head and side protection airbags, the lack of standard electronic stability management (ESC), and also the call by Suzuki not to test child restraint systems (CRS) to advocate. The performance of the pedestrian protection showed an appropriate level. Click the link to get more details